RSM logo
Laboratory Animals

Home Current issue Browse archive Alerts About the journal Feedback
 
Lab Anim 1984;18:75-80
doi:10.1258/002367784780864992
© 1984 Laboratory Animals Limited

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by López, A.
Right arrow Articles by García, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Energy/protein ratio in natural-ingredient diets for weanling rats. II. Energy and protein retention and efficiency of retention

A. López and C. García

Universidad de Chile, Instituto de Nutrición y Tecnología de los Alimentos (INTA), Casilla 15138, Santiago 11, Chile

A 3 x 3 factorial experiment was carried out, in which natural ingredient diets formulated at 3 digestible energy levels (DE) (100, 90 and 80% of NRC, 1978 recommendations) and at 3 energy: protein ratios (EPR) (63, 71 and 79 kJ DE/g crude protein (CP)) were fed to 8 weanling male Wistar rats/group. Half of these animals were sacrificed at the end of the 6-week experimental period and their body composition analyzed. Retentions of protein and energy were assessed by difference from a similar group of 8 rats killed and analyzed at the beginning of the experiment. No interaction was found between the 2 factors studied. Main results showed a decrease in intake and retention of both energy and protein, without affecting the efficiency of retention when energy level of diets was reduced by 20%. An increase in the EPR of the diets led to a decrease in protein intake and to an increase in efficiency of protein retention, without affecting the amount retained. No changes in body composition, nor in composition of live weight gains were found as a result of treatments. It is concluded that a 10% reduction in DE level of the diet is of no consequence, and that an EPR of 79 kJ/g leads to more efficient use of the dietary protein without detrimental effects over any other nutritional indicator.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?




Units Symbols and Abbreviations Sixth edition