RSM logo
Laboratory Animals

Home Current issue Browse archive Alerts About the journal Feedback
 
Lab Anim 1995;29:314-319
doi:10.1258/002367795781088342
© 1995 Laboratory Animals Limited

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Boot, R.
Right arrow Articles by Bisgaard, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Reclassification of 30 Pasteurellaceae strains isolated from rodents

R. Boot and M. Bisgaard

Section of Laboratory Animal Microbiology, Laboratory for Parasitology and Mycology, RIVM Bilthoven, the Netherlands; Department of Veterinary Microbiology, the Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, Frederiksberg C, Denmark

Thirty Pasteurellaceae strains isolated from gerbil, guineapig, hamster, mouse, muskrat and rat were reinvestigated and reclassified after comparison with reference strains. Strains originally described as Pasteurella pneumotropica were reclassified as [Pasteurella] pneumotropica Heyl biotype (7), [P.] pneumotropica Jawetz biotype (1), Pasteurella dagmatis (1) or Taxon 22 (2). Strains previously reported as Actinobacillus sp. were reclassified as [P.] pneumotropica biotype Jawetz (3), P. dagmatis (3) or Taxon 6 (7). Strains earlier described as Pasteurella gallinarum were renamed as SP group pasteurellas (4) or Taxon 25 (2). Some of these reclassified Pasteurellaceae have not been reported previously in rodents. The present findings underline the importance of extended characterization of isolates and comparison with reference strains to avoid misclassification within the family Pasteurellaceae Pohl 1981.

Key Words: PASTEURELLACEAE • RODENTS • RECLASSIFICATION


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Lab AnimHome page
R Boot, M J Vlemminx, and F A G Reubsaet
Comparison of polymerase chain reaction primer sets for amplification of rodent Pasteurellaceae
Lab Anim, October 1, 2009; 43(4): 371 - 375.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Microbiol. Rev.Home page
D. G. Baker
Natural Pathogens of Laboratory Mice, Rats, and Rabbits and Their Effects on Research
Clin. Microbiol. Rev., April 1, 1998; 11(2): 231 - 266.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



MDU Exam Doctor