Laboratory Animals > Volume 42, Number 3 > Pp. 331-337

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Google Scholar Articles by Birck, M M Articles by Hansen, A K PubMed PubMed Citation Social Bookmarking                      What's this?

Papers

A novel method for transuterine identification of piglets

M M Birck ^* , T Iburg , M Schmidt , P T Sangild  and A K Hansen ^*

^* Division of Laboratory Animal Science and Welfare, Department of Veterinary Pathobiology, Faculty of Life Sciences; Section of Pathology, Department of Veterinary Pathobiology, Faculty of Life Sciences; Veterinary Reproduction and Obstetrics, Department of Large Animals Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences; Department of Human Nutrition, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Denmark

Correspondence: M M Birck. Email: mbirck{at}life.ku.dk

Implantable microchips provide a secure, permanent and unique identification of individual animals. When performing fetal intervention studies in experimental animal models easy and secure identification of fetuses is desirable, as having test and control groups within the same uterus reduces the total number of animals used in a study. The aims of this study were: (1) to establish a protocol to identify porcine fetuses in utero by microchip implantation and (2) to assess postnatally whether clinical or pathological reactions to the implant occurred. Two Danish Landrace/Danish Large White crossbred sows at day 100 of gestation were used. The sows were sedated with azaperone and induced with propofol intravenously. Anaesthesia was maintained with isoflurane and oxygen. Antibiotics were administered intramuscularly (i.m.) at induction and analgesia was given pre-, intra- and postoperatively. A laparotomy was performed and the uterus exteriorized. The rump of the first fetus was recognized through the uterine wall and the thigh muscle of the fetus was fixed between the thumb and the forefinger. The microchip was then implanted into the fetus at an angle of 45° i.m. in the lateral hindleg using an insertion device with a 12G needle. The same procedure was done in every fetus. The uterus was returned to the abdomen and the abdominal wall closed. The sows gave birth to 24 liveborn piglets and one stillborn. None of the liveborn piglets were limping at the time of birth and no visible cutaneous or palpable reactions on the hindlegs were observed. Following euthanasia, the microchip was easily localized and no macroscopic reactions at the implantation site were seen. None of the piglets had more than one microchip implanted. Histology showed a chronic mild foreign body granulomatous inflammatory response with peripheral eosinophils surrounding the microchip. No inflammation was evident in the adjacent muscles. It is concluded that transuterine identification of piglets two weeks before delivery is feasible using a microchip implant as an effective, easy and reliable method for identification of individuals after birth.

Key Words: Microchip • piglet • fetal intervention • granulomatous inflammation • histology

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?