RSM logo
Laboratory Animals

Home Current issue Browse archive Alerts About the journal Feedback
 
This version was published on 1 January 2009
Lab Anim 2009;43:41-45
doi:10.1258/la.2007.007085
© 2009 Laboratory Animals Limited

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
la.2007.007085v1
43/1/41    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Manzo, A
Right arrow Articles by Fukamachi, K
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Papers

Comparative study of heart rate variability between healthy human subjects and healthy dogs, rabbits and calves

A Manzo, Y Ootaki , C Ootaki, K Kamohara and K Fukamachi

Department of Biomedical Engineering, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA

Corresponding author: Dr Yoshio Ootaki, 9500 Euclid Avenue/ND20, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA. Email: y.ootaki{at}nifty.com

Several studies have been performed to assess heart rate variability (HRV) in several species such as humans, dogs, pigs, calves, rabbits and rats. However, haemodynamic parameters are totally different in each animal, and optimal animal models for studying HRV corresponding to human HRV are still unclear. The purpose of this study was to assess HRV in human subjects and to compare those HRV data with canine, bovine and rabbit HRV data. The heart rate in the human subjects (62.8 ± 7.4 bpm) was significantly lower than that in dogs (124.2 ± 18.8 bpm, P < 0.001), calves (73.4 ± 10.5 bpm, P < 0.05), and rabbits (217.3 ± 21.5 bpm, P < 0.001). The low-frequency waves (LF) (57.9 ± 65.8 ms2/Hz) and high-frequency waves (HF) (33.8 ± 49.1 ms2/Hz) in rabbits were significantly lower than human LF (1216.3 ± 1220.7 ms2/Hz, P < 0.05) and HF (570.9 ± 581.3 ms2/Hz, P < 0.05). Dogs and calves showed similar LF (991.1 ± 646.1 ms2/Hz and 547.0 ± 256.9 ms2/Hz, respectively), HF (702.1 ± 394.1 ms2/Hz and 601.0 ± 666.6 ms2/Hz, respectively) and LF/HF (2.0 ± 1.3 and 2.5 ± 1.9, respectively) when compared with the human data. The present study shows that dogs and calves revealed similar HRV values as those which relate to humans. Large deviation of the HRV values in rabbits compared with humans might be considered when conducting animal studies using those animals to reflect human clinical situations.

Key Words: Heart rate variability • autonomic nervous system • sympathetic nerve • parasympathetic nerve • animal model


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?




History of the London Clinic