Laboratory Animals > Laboratory Animals Online First > 10.1258/la.2008.008009

This Article Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: la.2008.008009v1 43/2/165    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Pritchett-Corning, K. R Articles by Clifford, C. B Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Social Bookmarking                      What's this?

Paper

Contemporary prevalence of infectious agents in laboratory mice and rats

Kathleen R Pritchett-Corning ¹ , Janice Cosentino ² and Charles B Clifford ²

¹ Research Animal Diagnostic Services, Charles River Laboratories, Domaine des Oncins, BP 0109, 69592 L'arbresle Cedex, France; ² Research Animal Diagnostic Services, Charles River Laboratories, 251 Ballardvale Street, Wilmington, MA 01887, USA

Corresponding author: Kathleen R Pritchett-Corning, Charles River Laboratories, Manston Road, Margate, Kent CT9 4LT, UK. Email: kathleen.pritchett{at}crl.com

Periodic health screening of rodents used in research is necessary due to the consequences of unwanted infections. One determinant of the risk of infection for any given agent is its prevalence; other factors being equal, a prevalent agent is more likely than a rare one to be introduced to a research facility and result in infection. As an indicator of contemporary prevalence in laboratory populations of rats and mice, the rate of positive results in the samples received at a major commercial rodent diagnostic laboratory was compiled for this paper. Although samples from laboratory rodent vendors have been excluded, results are tabulated from samples from more than 500,000 mice and 80,000 rats submitted over several years from pharmaceutical, biotechnology, academic, and governmental institutions in North America and Europe, allowing meaningful determination of which agents are common in the research environment versus which agents are rare. In mice, commonly detected infectious agents include mouse norovirus, the parvoviruses, mouse hepatitis virus, rotavirus, Theiler's murine encephalomyelitis virus, Helicobacter spp., Pasteurella pneumotropica, and pinworms. In rats, commonly detected infectious agents include ‘rat respiratory virus’, the parvoviruses, rat theilovirus, Helicobacter spp., P. pneumotropica, and pinworms. A risk-based allocation of health-monitoring resources should concentrate frequency and/or sample size on these high-risk agents, and monitor less frequently for the remaining, lower-risk, infectious agents.

Key Words: Animals • laboratory • seroepidemiologic studies • mice • rats • rodent diseases

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. G. Ammann, R. J. Messer, K. Varvel, B. L. DeBuysscher, R. A. LaCasse, A. K. Pinto, and K. J. Hasenkrug Effects of Acute and Chronic Murine Norovirus Infections on Immune Responses and Recovery from Friend Retrovirus Infection J. Virol., December 15, 2009; 83(24): 13037 - 13041. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. M. Albers, M. A. Simon, and C. B. Clifford Histopathology of Naturally Transmitted "Rat Respiratory Virus": Progression of Lesions and Proposed Diagnostic Criteria Vet. Pathol., September 1, 2009; 46(5): 992 - 999. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]